WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: CMap 6 (Chimpanzee Sharing Behavior M Suchak), non-copulating females obtained food if they were perserverant which supports the "food for sex" hypothesis, shared at the same rate for both food qualities, but for different reasons which shows that food quality might affect the exchange of social benefits in chimpanzees (see females), they studied food sharing between males and females with high-quality food and low-quality food for females depending on the food quality, female behavior varied, they studied food sharing between males and females with high-quality food and low-quality food with 2 types of transfers harrassment, aggressive attempts at food which was not observed in this study, low- and middle-ranking females obtained for food the more they perservered which does not support any of the other food sharing hypothesis, depending on the food quality, female behavior varied with low-quality food (Fig. 1) low- and middle-ranking females obtained for food the more they perservered, perseverance which is benign attempts to access food, The Roles of Food Quality and Sex in Chimpanzee Sharing Behavior (Pan troglodytes) By J. Crick, *Malini Suchak, TM Eppley, MW Campbell and FBM de Waal in which they studied food sharing between males and females with high-quality food and low-quality food, high-ranking females obtained food without being perserverant, and did not gain anymore food by being perserverant which does not support any of the other food sharing hypothesis, they studied food sharing between males and females with high-quality food and low-quality food male food possessors shared at the same rate for both food qualities, but for different reasons, they studied food sharing between males and females with high-quality food and low-quality food with 2 types of transfers perseverance, females who copulated with male food possessor obtained more food with less perserverance in which copulation was not for reproductive purposes, depending on the food quality, female behavior varied with high-quality food non-copulating females obtained food if they were perserverant, depending on the food quality, female behavior varied with high-quality food females who copulated with male food possessor obtained more food with less perserverance, depending on the food quality, female behavior varied with low-quality food (Fig. 1) high-ranking females obtained food without being perserverant, and did not gain anymore food by being perserverant, copulation was not for reproductive purposes which supports the "food for sex" hypothesis, harrassment which is aggressive attempts at food