WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: KneaKristen_IST402_SP13_Consequentialism, Jeremy Bentham Oxford, age 12 Law School, age 15 Passed Bar, age 19, Two Important Parts Rule Utilitarianism, Modern Utilitarianism (Consequentialism) Two-level Utilitarianism, Preference Utilitarianism R.M. Hare, Preference Utilitarianism Richard Brandt, Preference Utilitarianism Ultimate criterion is an individual's wants and preferences, Maximization Principle Proper course of action maximizes happiness and reduces suffering, Range of values to be maximized Enjoyment of Beauty, Objections Fails to respect individual/ minority rights, Moral worth determined by resulting outcome of an action Objections, Theological Utilitarianism Pursuit of happiniss in the will of God, Utilitarianism Moral worth determined by resulting outcome of an action, John Stuart Mill Child prodigy Breakdown, age 20 Humanitarian concerns, Range of values to be maximized Love, Purely quantitative measurement of utility Net pleasure (pleasure minus pain), Preference Utilitarianism Peter Singer, Implausible that pleasure is the only measure of good Range of values to be maximized, Considered quality and quantity Higher pleasures more valuable than lower pleasures, Preference Utilitarianism John Harsanyi, Utilitarianism Classic Utilitarianism (Hedonism)