WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: 15.G-edited, If a law concerning the use of neurological tests should honor students's rights to refuse classifying neurological tests and schools should use these tests very critically & in an holistic manner, then a law concerning the use of neurological tests on at-risk violent students should either not require such testing, or use such required testing as only supplemental information in enrollment (or other educational) decisions. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A law concerning the use of neurological tests on at-risk violent students should either not require such testing, or use such required testing as only supplemental information in enrollment (or other educational) decisions., If identifying at-risk students for violence by campus or school health, educational, or administrative personnel will probably be arbitrary, then neurological testing on such "at-risk" students will probably not be applied fairly. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Neurological testing will probably not be applied fairly, Schools are expected to identify and remove potentially violent students. Therefore: Modus Ponens If schools are expected to identify and remove potentially violent students, then they should look for accurate methods or tests to detect potentially violent students, If schools will screen students for propensity for violence and schools will use these tests to affect student's enrollment status or even whether they might be expelled, then they should use these tests very criticially and in an holistic manner. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Schools should use these tests very critically and in an holistic manner, A propensity to violence can indicate potential for the student acting violently in school and endangering students. Therefore: Modus Ponens If schools should focus on student safety, and potentially violent students endanger other students, then schools are expected to identify and remove potentially violent students., Neurological testing will probably not be applied fairly supports Schools should not infringe upon student's rights to reject neurological tests for certain classification purposes., Either schools infringe upon students' ability to reject neurological tests for certain classification purposes or they honor students' rights to refuse classifying neurological tests therefore (ArgScheme: disjunctive syllogism) A law concerning the use of neurological tests should honor students's rights to refuse classifying neurological tests., A law concerning the use of neurological tests should honor students's rights to refuse classifying neurological tests. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A law concerning the use of neurological tests on at-risk violent students should either not require such testing, or use such required testing as only supplemental information in enrollment (or other educational) decisions., Recent advancements in neuroimaging have allowed for accurate predictions of propensity for violence Therefore: Modus Ponens If schools are expected to identify and remove potentially violent students, then they should look for accurate methods or tests to detect potentially violent students, Schools should use these tests very critically and in an holistic manner therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A law concerning the use of neurological tests on at-risk violent students should either not require such testing, or use such required testing as only supplemental information in enrollment (or other educational) decisions., Schools should focus on the safety of their students Therefore: Modus Ponens Schools are expected to identify and remove potentially violent students., Schools will use these tests to affect student's enrollment status or even whether they might be expelled. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Schools should use these tests very critically and in an holistic manner, Schools are expected to identify and remove potentially violent students. Therefore: Modus Ponens Schools should screen students for propensity for violence, According to "Achieving Excellence in Preschool Literacy Instruction", identifying students as at-risk for a learning problem is quite arbitrary. supports Identifying at-risk students for violence by campus or school health, educational, or administrative personnel will probably be arbitrary., Recent advancements in neuroimaging have allowed for accurate predictions of propensity for violence Therefore: Modus Ponens Schools should screen students for propensity for violence, Schools should not infringe upon student's rights to reject neurological tests for certain classification purposes. therefore (ArgScheme: disjunctive syllogism) A law concerning the use of neurological tests should honor students's rights to refuse classifying neurological tests., Identifying at-risk students for violence by campus or school health, educational, or administrative personnel will probably be arbitrary. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Neurological testing will probably not be applied fairly, A propensity to violence can indicate potential for the student acting violently in school and endangering students. Therefore: Modus Ponens Schools are expected to identify and remove potentially violent students., Resting heart rate levels, amplitude of brain event-related potential (ERP) responses, volume and activity in specific brain regions and levels of the brain neurotransmitter serotonin are some biological variables that can reliably differentiate those who demonstrate aggressive behavior (or are at risk of it) from non-aggressive individuals. supports Recent advancements in neuroimaging have allowed for accurate predictions of propensity for violence, Schools will screen students for propensity for violence therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Schools should use these tests very critically and in an holistic manner