WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: ArgSchemes Overview, what is true for the four ravens I saw is true for all ravens therefore (ArgScheme: complete induction) all ravens are black, this does not matter much, because any objection against the enabler will teach us some- thing, and can be used to revise the argument accordingly. Follow the link below for examples coments on 2. the enabler of such an argument is usually hard to defend, if a road-pricing scheme saved London from traffic collapse, then a road-pricing scheme would save Atlanta from traffic collapse therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) a road-pricing scheme would save Atlanta from traffic collapse, If r, then q therefore (ArgScheme: conditional syllogism) If r, then p, a road-pricing scheme saved London from traffic collapse both these arguments are logically equivalent a road-pricing scheme would save Atlanta from traffic collapse, Dr Brown claims p therefore (ArgScheme: perfect authority) p, If someone is a rational human being, then this person is responsible for what he or she does therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Paul is responsible for what he did, not p therefore (ArgScheme: disjunctive syllogism) q, if p then r therefore (ArgScheme: constructive dilemma) either s or r (but maybe both), If the ball drops, the lever will turn to the right therefore (ArgScheme: conditional syllogism) If the ball drops, the engine will stop, Dr Brown claims p therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) p, If all the ravens I saw in all my life were black, then all ravens are black therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) all ravens are black, not q therefore (ArgScheme: modus tollens) not p, either Donna knew the infor- mation on her tax returns were wrong or she did not know therefore (ArgScheme: constructive dilemma) either Donna was lying, or she was negligent, If the lever turns to the right, the engine will stop therefore (ArgScheme: conditional syllogism) If the ball drops, the engine will stop, it cannot be both the case that p and q, but maybe none of both therefore (ArgScheme: not-both syllogism) it is not the case that p, either Joan or Ann rows the boat therefore (ArgScheme: disjunctive syllogism) Ann rows the boat, either p or q therefore (ArgScheme: constructive dilemma) r, if Dr Brown claims p, then p therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) p, Paul is a rational human being therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Paul is responsible for what he did