WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: defeasible-reasoning-in-a-dialogue, Tweety is not impaired therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Tweety can fly, if something is a bird, and is not of that kind of bird that cannot fly, and is not impaired, then it can fly therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Tweety can fly, Key and LAM conventions see click on the small icon under this text box, Tweety is a cartoon figure therefore (ArgScheme: not-all syllogism) it is not the case that Tweety is a bird, Tweety is not of that kind of bird that cannot fly therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Tweety can fly, if something is a bird, then it can fly therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Tweety can fly, if its wings are torn, it cannot fly defeats by counter example if something is a bird, and is not of that kind of bird that cannot fly, then it can fly, Tweety has never been drawn with wings therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) it is not the case that Tweety can fly, Tweety is not impaired therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Tweety can fly, Tweety is a bird therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Tweety can fly, if something is a bird, then it can fly therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Tweety can fly, if Tweety is a cartoon figure and if Tweety has never been drawn with wings, then it is not the case that Tweety can fly therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) it is not the case that Tweety can fly, it is not the case that Tweety is a bird defeats by counter argument Tweety is a bird, Defeasible reasoning in a dialogue visualized according to the rules and conventions of Logical Argument Mapping (LAM), if something is a bird, and is not of that kind of bird that cannot fly, and is not impaired, then it can fly therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Tweety can fly, Tweety is a bird therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Tweety can fly, Tweety is a bird therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Tweety can fly, Tweety is a bird therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Tweety can fly, it cannot be the case, at the same time, that Tweety is a bird and Tweety is a cartoon figure therefore (ArgScheme: not-all syllogism) it is not the case that Tweety is a bird, Tweety is not of that kind of bird that cannot fly therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Tweety can fly