Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: Final, fundamental attribution error/ correspndence bias for example Castro experiment: students assumed attitudes essayists who were forced to choose a side, immunity to disconfirmation an example of The cognitive perspective, Outgroup homogenity effect explains The cognitive perspective, The cognitive perspective show self-fulfilling prophecies, Actor-Observor difference states Observor, Illusory correlation explains The cognitive perspective, immunity to disconfirmation even though we know of different circumstances we choose to believe what we want or what is easiest people tend to skip the information and assume the behavior relates to attitudes, people tend to ignore the situational factors that cause a behavior and focus just on the behavior causes fundamental attribution error/ correspndence bias, Errors in Attribution such as self-serving bias, fundamental attribution error/ correspndence bias states as humans we relate behaviors as a direct result of a what type of person someone is, Actor focuses more situational factors, controlled means requires thinking or mental energy, Fasle consensus effect causes Errors in Attribution, Observor focuses more behavioral and personal factors, The cognitive perspective processes controlled, takes less energy to process behavioral factors causes fundamental attribution error/ correspndence bias, Castro experiment: students assumed attitudes essayists who were forced to choose a side results showed people tend to skip the information and assume the behavior relates to attitudes, self-serving bias people usually relate success, takes more mental energy to process situational factors causes fundamental attribution error/ correspndence bias, failure relate external factors