WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: Nanotechnology in Medicine Group 1 ED, A normative coherence approach should be used to reduce the exploitation of public funded research. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence reasoning approach would be the development of an international treaty establishing global principles for transparent and accountable expert collaborations in the safety and cost-effectiveness assessment of new health technologies., The current system recommended FDA provide guidance to manufactures about when the use of nanoscale ingredients may reguire submission of additional data, change the products regulatory status or pathway, or merit taking additional steps to address potential safety or product quality issues. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) The current public health laws and policy being used try to encourage a code of conduct for industry without a legal requirement for broad normative coherence., Exposure can occur during manufacture or use of nanotechnology in medicine and human biosecurity. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) The safety of ENPs must be ensured., If a coherance reasoning approach would be beneficial to reduce the effects of conflicts in interest in ensuring safety, reduce the exploitation of public funded research, bring about equalities in expenditure of public funds, and enhance public confidence in government and science, then a normative coherence reasoning approach should be applied to nanotechnology in global health law and policy development. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence reasoning approach should be applied to nanotechnology in global health law and policy development., A normative coherence approach should be taken. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach would facilitate formal documentary links between standards and recommendations., If the current regulatory approach allows individual corporate entities to financially exploit without social responsibilities is inchoherent with bioethics and international human rights norms, then a normative coherence approach should be taken. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach should be taken., If corporate capture of the regulatory architecture for globally influential safety regulators has led to the erosion of rigorously objective scientific assessment, then there is a conflict of interest in the current policies for ensuring the safety of nanotechnology. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) There is a conflict of interest in the current policies for ensuring the safety of nanotechnology., If the current public health laws and policy being used try to encourage a code of conduct for industry without a legal requirement for broad normative coherence, then the current public health laws and policy are not working to limit the conflicts of interest in ensuring safety because they allow development to proceed in a deregulated environment. . therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) The current public health laws and policy do not work to limit the conflicts of interest in ensuring safety., One of the first nanomedical devices approved by FDA bypassed requirement for a lengthy and costly clinical study because regulators deemed that its constituent nanoscale calcium phosphate fitted a category of existing approved macroscale products therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) The current public health laws and policy being used try to encourage a code of conduct for industry without a legal requirement for broad normative coherence., If a normative coherence approach were to be used, then it would create a link between standards and reccommendations, permit public interest disclosures, and provide a means of challenging safety risks. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach would support public health laws and policies that permit public interest disclosures by staff of safety regulators who were previously unsuccessful with taking their concerns through established pathways., A normative coherence reasoning approach will encourage health policymakers and their staff to be skeptical of ostensibly objective papers with non-evidence-based conclusions. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A coherance reasoning approach would be beneficial to bring about equalities in expenditure of public funds., A normative coherence reasoning approach would be the development of an international treaty establishing global principles for transparent and accountable expert collaborations in the safety and cost-effectiveness assessment of new health technologies. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A coherance reasoning approach would be beneficial to bring about equalities in expenditure of public funds., A normative coherence approach could encourage incentives for public and private research institutions to concentrate mulit-disciplinary expertise forming links between science, marketing and a broad range of public and private interests in regulation. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A coherance reasoning approach would be beneficial to reduce the exploitation of public funded research., It is unclear whether there are safety risks to exposure to ENPs. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Safety data for nanotherapeutic products needs to be gathered, analyzed, categorized, and characterized., A normative coherence approach would support public health laws and policies that permit public interest disclosures by staff of safety regulators who were previously unsuccessful with taking their concerns through established pathways. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A coherance reasoning approach would be beneficial to reduce the effects of conflicts of interest in ensuring safety., A normative coherence approach should be taken. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach would support public health laws and policies that permit public interest disclosures by staff of safety regulators who were previously unsuccessful with taking their concerns through established pathways., The safety of ENPs must be ensured. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Safety data for nanotherapeutic products needs to be gathered, analyzed, categorized, and characterized., If the current public health laws and policy are not working to limit the conflicts of interest in ensuring safety, then a normative approach to the health laws and policy should be taken. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence approach should be taken., A normative coherence approach could assist policymakers with considering, developing and implementing regulatory mechanisms that will allow a proportion of public investment to be recouped from a successfully marketed product that recieved substantial public start-up funding. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A coherance reasoning approach would be beneficial to reduce the exploitation of public funded research., A coherance reasoning approach would be beneficial to reduce the effects of conflicts of interest in ensuring safety. therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) A normative coherence reasoning approach should be applied to nanotechnology in global health law and policy development.