Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: class solution for all of Jims problems, If people will realize there are drastic measures on the horizon, then people will be frightened into reducing their collective carbon foot print therefore (ArgScheme: constructive dilemma) either People will feel less urgency about reducing greenhouse gas emissions or People will be frightened into reducting their collective carbon foot print, Public dissusion should take place sooner rather than later defeats If scientists will engage people to discuss their work, then their work will be misunderstood or portrayed in inaccurate or sensationalized terms (NYT - para 20), If scientists believe they should not be involved discussion of ethical questions then they will not participate in a discussion of ethics therefore (Argscheme: modus ponens) Scientists will not participate in a public discussion of ethics, the public misunderstands scientific work therefore MP scientists shouldnt talk about their scientific work, It is unethical not to research how to engineer possible remedies -- and to let policy makers know of its potential (NYT Para 17) supports If science research has serious potential implications in the real world then public discussion should take place sooner rather than later (NYT para 21), Either People will realize there are technical fixes for global warming or People will realize there are drastic measurs on horizon therefore (ArgScheme: constructive dilemma) either People will feel less urgency about reducing greenhouse gas emissions or People will be frightened into reducting their collective carbon foot print, Geoengineering will inevitably produce environmental effects impossible to predict and impossible to undo (NYT - para 1) Therefore (Argscheme: Modus Ponens AU YT) New Technologies are inherently dangerous, Scientists will lose control of their work therefore (Argscheme modus ponens) Their work will be misunderstood or portrayed in inaccurate or sensationalized terms, it the public then therefore MP scientists shouldnt talk about their scientific work, Scientists will engage people to discuss their work therefore (Argscheme modus ponens) If scientists will engage people to discuss their work, then their work will be misunderstood or portrayed in inaccurate or sensationalized terms (NYT - para 20), Geo-engineering is largely speculative and unproven and has risk of unkown side effects Supports (Arg Scheme : Perfect Authority AU: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) If geoengineering will inevitably produce new technologies that produce environmental effects that are impossible to predict and impossible to undo, then the new technologies are inherently dangerous, Either People will realize there are technical fixes for global warming or People will realize there are drastic measurs on horizon therefore (Argscheme: modus ponens) If people realize there are technical fixes for global warming, then people will feel less urgenc about reducing greenhouse gas emissions (NYT - para 17), Ethical issues have long ooccupied biotechnology therefore: (Arhscheme perfect analogy Ethical issues will occupy geoengineering, Scientists believe they should not be involved in discussion of ethical questions therefore (Argscheme: modus ponens) Scientists will not participate in a public discussion of ethics, Science research has serious potnetial implications in the real world therefore (Argscheme: modus ponens) Public dissusion should take place sooner rather than later, Ethical issues will occupy geoengineering defeats Scientists believe they should not be involved in discussion of ethical questions, Scientists will lose control of their work therefore (Argscheme modus ponens) If scientists will engage people to discuss their work, then their work will be misunderstood or portrayed in inaccurate or sensationalized terms (NYT - para 20), Either People will realize there are technical fixes for global warming or People will realize there are drastic measurs on horizon therefore (Argscheme: modus ponens) People will feel less urgency about reducing greenhouse gas emissions, If people realize there are technical fixes for global warming, then people will feel less urgenc about reducing greenhouse gas emissions therefore (ArgScheme: constructive dilemma) either People will feel less urgency about reducing greenhouse gas emissions or People will be frightened into reducting their collective carbon foot print, reason therefore claim