Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: article 1, nursing documentation data with quality/fidelity, nursing documentation data thought to be "dirty", credible for program evalution, Omaha System can be trusted voice, validity thus credible, nursing documentation data can be trusted voice, Omaha System thought to be not granular, credible can be trusted voice, validity through theory-based evaluation, nursing documentation data using Omaha System, nursing documentation data thought to be biased, nursing documentation data thought to be unsuitable for research, quality/fidelity demonstrated validity, theory-based evaluation replicating previous research Barnard et al., 1989, credible for research